Tuesday, March 17, 2020

Competition At Comsat University Islamabad

Competition At Comsat University Islamabad Free Online Research Papers The students of 6th and final semester got a notice by Department of Computer Science UoB on notice board. A competition which was about, poster, project, one the spot programming that were holding on 11th October at COMSAT wah cant Islamabad. Every one feel like was going to participate there in a jiffy, but there were certain conditions from our department, which were necessary to full filling them. Department announced a test for selection. Test was very necessary for those cognition students because it was also introspection and without test it was difficult to rely on every one. So once for all ten students selected to go Islamabad at COMSAT for participation. In 8th October we became assured by Chairman, the students should be prepared to go Islamabad through the funding of University of Baluchistan. According to the instructions of Chairman on 9th October all students should be reached at Sada Bhar terminal to go Islamabad by bus which they hade all followed. The root was very long it was distance Quetta to Islamabad, approximately after 36 hours we reached over there. It was 3 am and 11th October and right 9am we had to go for participation at COMSAT University. Due to long journey every one tired and out of sorts as well to hade a bee in bonnet. Instead of to make cow and bull story all students prepared with root and branch to compete them. They broke one’s neck and obeyed the apple pie order of Chairman. It would say equal to call a spade a spade no one got top three position, some students got: 4th,5th,and 6th position. It was severe condition due to result for all and because of the courage of our good breading chairman all of became hopeful again. All students had been scrutinized if they broke one’s neck a little bit more they can do that task. Our teacher Danish was with us for guidance. He was aggrandizing our energy and teaching us the way of surging and remove the deprivation, every time he was inaugurating us for our care. After competition we students went to Allama Iqbal Open University at guest house with inaugurating our chairman and teacher to stay four days over there. This trip was also included with study to call upon. To go hand in hand we visited so many weird places and all students’ hade optimism together. Every keen student interested to get latest update and wants to enjoy the climate of education. It was good exposure for students to revive their diminish knowledge and collect something new, it was also enlightenment and got experience. At the very first day after competition we visited the Allama Iqbal Open University especially a computer science department and meet with Director, of IT sector who were completely briefed us their system which they have implemented and it was 12th October. Next day we went to COMSAT University again to visit their IT sector and computer science department, it was very quick visit after that we went to Qauid-e-Azam University to meet especially with Masoom yasin zai, who is vice chancellor of that University. It was nice meeting with VC, completely briefed and gave us their university updates and also he gave connivance for fresh mint. Computer science faculty portioned in two departments: CS and IT both were separate each other after that in a Computer centre we met with Director Bukhari, which was very co-operative person because of his oi ly tongue. Summary It was competition at COMSAT wah cant Islamabad. The student of UoB had been participated there under the supervision of our Chairman Mr.Khalid Badini. This trip was included with study tour, we spent 10 days over there, by the kindness of our chairman we visited weird and glamour places and met with personalities’. My views At the very beginning I am thankful to my Chairman Mr.Khalid Hussain Badni, because this event we got by the efforts of him. It is excessive difficult for UoB students to get these kind of events. I am appreciating the erudition of our Chairman, who is cautious for our carrier. By the striving of Mr.Badini, we confronted the mega IT event and he amalgamated us with national level students which was very pleasure for us. Repercussion of this event we aggrandized our knowledge which is aesthetic with our future. In last I am very thankful to my teacher Sir Danish who accompanied us, when we felt bore he was supporting us and trying to make a fresh mint therefore we did not feel bore any time during the trip period. Research Papers on Competition At Comsat University IslamabadStandardized TestingInfluences of Socio-Economic Status of Married MalesTwilight of the UAWPersonal Experience with Teen PregnancyRiordan Manufacturing Production PlanResearch Process Part OneOpen Architechture a white paperIncorporating Risk and Uncertainty Factor in CapitalAnalysis of Ebay Expanding into AsiaQuebec and Canada

Sunday, March 1, 2020

Supreme Court Cases Dealing with Pornography

Supreme Court Cases Dealing with Pornography The Supreme Court has addressed pornography more often than almost any other issue of comparable specificity, and small wonder why- the Court has read an implicit obscenity exception to the free speech clause, giving it the unenviable responsibility of interpreting an unstated 18th-century definition of obscenity two centuries later. And the more the Court has attempted to define obscenity, the more complex that definition has become.The Supreme Court made things slightly easier for itself in three cases, all decided between 1967 and 1973.Jacobellis v. Ohio (1967)Forced to determine whether the art film Les Amants was obscene, despite the fact that it was obviously not intended to serve as pornography, the Court acknowledged the difficulty of its job- before ruling in favor of the film on multiple, vague grounds. Justice Potter Stewart memorably captured the Courts challenge: It is possible to read the Courts opinion in [past pornography cases] in a variety of ways. In saying this, I imply no criticism of the Court, which, in those cases, was faced with the task of trying to define what may be indefinable. I have reached the conclusion, which I think is confirmed at least by negative implication in the Courts [recent decisions] that, under the First and Fourteenth Amendments, criminal laws in this area are constitutionally limited to hard-core pornography. I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description, and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it, and the motion picture involved in this case is not that. These are the rights that appellant is asserting in the case before us. He is asserting the right to read or observe what he pleases the right to satisfy his intellectual and emotional needs in the privacy of his own home. He is asserting the right to be free from state inquiry into the contents of his library. Georgia contends that appellant does not have these rights, that there are certain types of materials that the individual may not read or even possess. Georgia justifies this assertion by arguing that the films in the present case are obscene.But we think that mere categorization of these films as obscene is insufficient justification for such a drastic invasion of personal liberties guaranteed by the First and Fourteenth Amendments. Whatever may be the justifications for other statutes regulating obscenity, we do not think they reach into the privacy of ones own home. If the First Amendment means anything, it means that a State has no business telling a man, sitting alone in his own house, what books he may read or what films he may watch. Our whole constitutional heritage rebels at the thought of giving government the power to control mens minds. The difficulty is that we do not deal with constitutional terms, since obscenity is not mentioned in the Constitution or Bill of Rights †¦ for there was no recognized exception to the free press at the time the Bill of Rights was adopted which treated obscene publications differently from other types of papers, magazines, and books †¦ What shocks me may be sustenance for my neighbor. What causes one person to boil up in rage over one pamphlet or movie may reflect only his neurosis, not shared by others. We deal here with a regime of censorship which, if adopted, should be done by constitutional amendment after full debate by the people.Obscenity cases usually generate tremendous emotional outbursts. They have no business being in the courts. If a constitutional amendment authorized censorship, the censor would probably be an administrative agency. Then criminal prosecutions could follow as, if, and when publishers defied the censor and sold their literature. Under that regi me, a publisher would know when he was on dangerous ground. Under the present regime whether the old standards or the new ones are used the criminal law becomes a trap. In practice, all but the most harmful and exploitative forms of pornography have generally been decriminalized despite the Courts relative lack of clarity on this issue.